Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Call the CIA - PUSD had a Data Breach

By now I think it safe to say, many of you have seen the uproar over the “Data Breach” at PUSD. At first blush, it sounds bad and concerning. In today’s information age, “Data” is power. With power comes responsibility. The problem is power corrupts and blinds normal thinking. I watched the “Special Meeting” called by the PUSD School Board to address the issues surrounding the “Data Breach”. It’s hard not to shake one’s head and not voice the thoughts running through my mind out loud. “REALLY?” is what popped out of my mouth several times as I tried listening, while not laughing, at the absurdity of it all.

It is abundantly clear someone screwed up. It is clear changes need to be made to ensure this does not occur in the future. It’s also clear this was made into something it is not. I will explain, but after stumbling upon the thirty-eight (38) page manifesto by Gabriela Dow (Link Here) detailing her interpretation of the events, I’m not sure really what the “End Game” is in all of this.

If you have not read the “Dow Report” above, grab your favorite beverage, find a comfortable chair and take the time to read it. It’s long, wordy, repetitive and written with a flair for the dramatic. A disclaimer; ensure your internet security is up to date and working and cross your fingers there is no malware or worms secreted into the link above (tongue firmly planted in cheek).

Ms. Dow received information not intended for her to receive nor possess. That is a given. What Ms. Dow did with this information is as concerning as the fact she received it in the first place. Motive is a question in the evaluation of any act. Leonardo de Vinci said it best; “Every action needs to be prompted by a motive.” I am not a mind reader and won’t speculate as to why she felt the need to give the information she received to the District Attorney and then file a complaint with the State’s Cybersecurity Task Force in Sacramento. She attempts to explain this in her report by way of a question and answer format on page one.

The remainder of the report is what it is. No doubt, cathartic for Ms. Dow and a way to justify her actions after receiving the data. I did have to laugh at the information shared on page four regarding spyware and protecting her family. I digress.

To further her explanation and provide her side of the events (her 38 page report is not enough) Dow wrote the following:

     As promised, please find via the URL below a comprehensive summary of what I directly observed related to the Poway Unified School District data breach that involved over 36,000 students and 70,000 parents' private information. The CDs that I received contained COPIES OF EMAILS dating back to 2014, which demonstrates that the attached spreadsheets with our private data were emailed by third-party vendors long before this recent incident. 

     We need to understand how this specific breach happened, and why the spreadsheets with personal contact info, medical data, test scores, parents' occupations, mobile phone numbers, etc were being emailed around and then handed out to a member of the public. 


     This summary doc answers the most common questions and misinformation I have seen since this horrible data breach that resulted from my work with the District Educational Technology Advisory Committee (ETAC). The reason I contacted the District Attorney's office is because I did not believe PUSD would notify parents if they were the only ones with evidence of the data breach. Additional reasons are detailed in the summary along with copies you can review of the many emails and other communication between PUSD board, managers, their attorney, ETAC, etc. 

     You can also see video of concerned parents speaking at the May 18 emergency board meeting that was finally called to address the data breach I reported on May 9 (I am the last speaker) via http://powayusd.com/en-US/Board/Video/boe-2016-05-08

     It is disappointing that it took this long for the board to finally meet, and also that it took calls from a Union Tribune reporter to get the district to finally notify parents that anything had happened. Part of the reason I contacted the DA's office is because I was told by board member Kimberley Beatty that board president Michelle O'Connor-Ratcliff had decided to not call an emergency meeting for the board members when I reported the breach but instead wanted staff and the attorneys to handle the very breach that they allowed to happen. 

     I have told many of you for months and months that I simply cannot believe what I see happening with our school district. I keep thinking I have seen worst of it, then I saw how carelessly our most private data was just handed out. THEN I saw how some people were spreading rumors that I somehow tricked the district into releasing the data or that I was trying to make a big deal out of nothing. Attempts to shift focus to the person that identified and reported the alarming data breach from the district officials and break-down (or lack of) process that allowed this to happen has got to be the worst thing I have observed at PUSD.

     Thank you to each and every one of you that has stood up for me when you see the ridiculous online rumors or hear people trashing my attempt to have this data breach addressed responsibly. 

     Please share this with any PUSD parents or community members that you know, and feel free to share on social media. I can only reach so many people directly, but all PUSD families deserve to receive more details and answers about how their personal, confidential data was carelessly handled. It is important that everyone is informed on what happened, how we can address this serious risk, why I took the steps I did to report the problem and why other parents need to get involved. 

     I recognize, as I describe in the summary, that this is only my experience with how the data breach happened and how long I think our data has been emailed around and possibly misused. I recognize that there is context I am not aware of and that is why I hope to receive clear answers from our district. I hope they can see this summary I prepared, and all of the supporting material, as an example of how complete transparency and clarity can be provided to the community. 

     I hope to see many of you at the May 31 PUSD board meeting. Details are posted via the link below and the agenda should be added soon:


     The ETAC committee that I serve on was already scheduled to present our final recommendations to the board on May 31st. I have included these recommendations in the final pages of the attached data breach summary-- please review these and get involved. These recommendations address just some of the leadership, safety and tech planning challenges our district faces. Cybersecurity was an item the recommendations addressed, but ETAC was thinking of teachers, parents and students that need education about keeping their data safe, we had no idea that the district itself was lacking policies and processes for handling some of our most private data. 

      We need accountability for this mistake and for any other breaches that are uncovered, but we also need to unite the community and truly work together to stop this downward spiral of one issue after another. With our Superintendent on paid leave and so many years of simple challenges ballooning into epic battles due to a lack of fair, competent leadership and clear communication from the Superintendent's office, this is really a time to stop the petty fighting to do the right thing for all of our kids. 

     With that, there are additional questions I receive on a daily basis that I didn't include in the (long enough) summary, but that I will address here for friends:

     1. Will you run for school board? No. While I do realize the need for board members that can address these serious challenges head-on and to finally get majority votes to be able to implement necessary reforms, I have seen enough of the toxic culture within the old "Po-way" and Federation of Teachers union leadership mounting personal attacks, spreading misinformation and booing people at board meetings, that the only direction I am running in is away from such an awful environment. I do strongly support Kimberley Beatty's re-election as I have experienced her to be a strong leader that actually listens to the community, that asks questions despite staff being offended at the request that they explain and improve their outdated processes. I also commend board member Charles Sellers and hope to see board member T.J. Zane finally start voting and making decisions to support families and tax-payers vs consultants, attorneys and a Superintendent that needs to go. 

     2. Are you going to sue the district? No. Like all parents I am certainly monitoring the District's responses and activity to make sure they do not try to shift focus on the recipient of the data vs the fact that they mishandled confidential material (something the DA's office called ridiculous but a concern I am getting from parents, "they will try to blame this on you") and I will of course defend myself in any way that is necessary. But I don't believe more attorneys are what are needed to fix these serious problems. The District needs to complete a thorough investigation to understand how private data has been handled, communicate honestly with the public and implement secure processes to make sure the data is handled safely. 

     3. How can I help? Please review the attached summary, the ETAC minutes (http://powayusd.com/en-US/Board/Board-Advisory-Committees), the board minutes, talk to people that are actually involved, and get involved yourself by attending the May 31st board meeting. Take a deep breath, as I have had to do so many times through the course of this ordeal and realize that despite challenges this is an AMAZING community and school district with talented, dedicated, hard-working teachers, staff, parents, coaches and kids. We just need to get our leaders working together, to demand accountability for lack of transparency and mismanagement like we have seen from the Superintendent-- and we need to recruit an amazing new Superintendent that can work with the board, empower qualified (not just loyal) managers and address problems fairly with the community. 

     Thanks so much guys, I will see you at the May 31 board meeting and throughout this summer! 

     Gaby

I do not for a millisecond, believe the inadvertent passing of the information Ms. Dow received, is not serious. In perspective, it is not the end of the world and it is not earth shattering. The information Ms. Dow received should not have been provided to her and when she realized what the information was, it should have been returned to the District, NOT the District Attorney. The “Data Breach” has been furthered and the cry for justice muted by the further dissemination of this information to persons who did not need to possess it.

I often hear people complain about laws, policy, transparency, ethical behavior and more. I hear complaints that the “system” takes too long to work. Instant gratification at its finest. The people who complain about laws, policy, transparency and ethical behavior are most often the ones who don’t believe any of it applies to them. “That’s a stupid policy”; “That law is ridiculous”; “I tried to bring it to their attention, they ignored me” (They didn’t answer the telephone so I did it my way).

In perspective, the information Ms. Dow received, should not have landed in her hands. The information was not gained by illegal or nefarious means. The information was not gained for ill purposes, by an individual who wished to use the information for bad intentions. The information was secure for all real purposes. The concern is to ensure this failure does not occur again. To do that, the Board must set clear direction and hold accountable those entrusted with the security of private and confidential information. That appears to be their course, BEFORE the special meeting was called. While certain members of the Board and public wish to grandstand and point fingers, it is the calm, level heads of reason who methodically moved to plug the “Data Breach” hole.


To those who want to use this event to remove the President of the School Board, your motivations are misguided and out of sync with reality. I trust Dr. Mel Robinson was working diligently to find out how this occurred and working to ensure it does not happen again. I trust Ms. O’Connor-Ratcliff was working with Dr. Robinson and staff with the same goal in mind. I just happen to be one of those people who follow the rules and laws, and trust in the system and allow the system to work, for good or bad. If you want your district to work for you, you must work with your district. In life you often get what you give. This issue is now part of history. Nothing about this can be changed. Moving forward, the District is taking steps to ensure it not happen in the future. It’s time for others to move forward as well. 

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Righteous Judgment

Often I catch myself wondering what is in the minds of people. Thirty-three years of law enforcement most assuredly jades an individual, but I cannot wrap my head around the hate, vile and outright filth people will say and write. I try and understand why people will latch onto an event that occurred some 20+ years ago and speak as if the event took place last week. What possess people to degrade a person, again using an event that took place over 20+ years ago?

I’m not a religious person by any stretch. I am not a bible thumper or born again anything. I grew up in a Catholic home, going to parochial school from first grade through high school. I served as an altar boy and participated in all the church offered. My wife and I were married in the church and have been together in marriage for almost 37 years (together over 40 in total). Our children were baptized into the church and were given a foundation of faith each have carried into their adult lives. I am no angel and surly not without fault or sin. The closest I come to being a choirboy, is Joseph Wambaugh’s description of one in his books of the same title. After this admission, I guess I should brace for the onslaught of hate. Those days long gone and mostly forgotten, at least by those of us who lived them and understand them. 

In Romans 2:1-2; God’s Righteous Judgment, the bible talks about those who judge others.

Therefore, you have no excuse or defense or justification, whoever you are who judges and condemns another. For, in posing as judge and passing sentence on another, you condemn yourself, because you who judge are habitually practicing the very same things that you censure and denounce.
So, when you, a mere man (or woman), pass judgment on them and you do the same things, do you think you will escape God’s judgment?
I look at those who most often and with the loudest of voices cast their judgments and I believe this to be so very true.

In John 8; Jesus states,

“If any one of you is without sin, let him cast the first stone.”

I continue to struggle with, “why”. Why have a small group of disgruntled and angry people, filled with hate, chosen to latch onto an event that bears no significance today, 20+ years later. As I search for meaning and reason, I look at the bible and Matthew 7, where the bible talks again about judging others.

In the same way you judge others, you will be judged. If you judge with an evil heart or dark intent, His judgment of you will reflect it. If you use extremes, exaggerations or other ignoble means, His judgment of you will reflect that also.
Do not accuse others unless you first thoroughly search your own heart and mind to make certain you are pure in every possible way.
Remember, Jesus was the only sinless person.
I am at a loss to understand the righteous indignation of those who continue their assaults.

In John 8, Jesus said to the sinner, “Neither do I condemn thee; go, sin no more”.

The only person to inhabit this earth without sin, refused to condemn another. Yet, many have found it their right; their obligation; their duty; their privilege; their calling, to judge another. The ignoble means of those who self righteously judge and condemn, is pathetic. 

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Coalition Seeks Supporters and Candidates

I'm writing this BLOG post to let you know of a coalition I am a member of, and to ask you to consider supporting our efforts in service to the PUSD Board of Education (School Board) functioning at the level of professionalism and excellence that our district deserves.

The goal of the Coalition For Effective School Board Leadership is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of School Board business through the endorsement of candidates running for School Board in the November, 2016 election.



Please learn more, and consider helping in the following ways:

Host a coffee meeting at your home or business to educate voters on the importance of this School Board election in November.  The Coalition will provide spokespersons to speak at your coffee meeting.

Check out our website at;  www.coalition4effectiveschoolboard.com

Endorse our work as a Coalition;



Consider running for School Board, or talking to someone you know who would make a great candidate!  We need people from the community who meet our 6 criteria for vetting candidates to run!

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Keith Wilson Continues to Harass

I have talked about the pathetic and caustic e-mails Keith Wilson has sent members of the Poway Unified School District in the past. His e-mails all containing sexual innuendo and foul language directed at men and women alike. His comments seldom related to a specific educational topic and most always simply to harass and demean. I shared an e-mail in a prior post that Wilson sent to Sandy Burgoyne on April 6, 2016, at 11:10 AM. (See Below)


Yesterday I received another e-mail sent by Wilson on the same day at 9:24:59 AM. Wilson sent an e-mail to Candy Smiley, President of the Poway Federation of Teachers. (See Below)

Subject: PUSD Meeting
Date: April 6, 2016 at 9:24:59 AM PDT

Hello Candy,
 
I'm sorry that you left the meeting before I was able to say fuck you.  Your stone face belongs on Mt. Rushmore.
 
Did you notice that your IBPS partner has extremely small hands?
 
Feeling the love,
 
Keith
The above e-mail clearly shows the mind of a disturbed, troubled, pathetic person. Wilson's reference to an "IBPS partner" is a reference to the Superintendent and the small hands I think self explanatory due to the discussion among candidates for POTUS. Again, taking sexual innuendo and inserting it into an e-mail for no purpose other than to degrade and demean.

Is there any wonder why Kim Garnier, Keith Wilson's daughter, feels empowered to speak as she does and to write the caustic e-mails she does? Chris Garnier is in another league when it comes to caustic e-mails and speech. Put the three together and you have to feel for the children being raised in that home. They do not stand a chance.

Ten Years folks. Ten years before the light at the end of the tunnel will begin to flicker. What happens in ten years? Think.  

Monday, April 11, 2016

PUSD School Board April 5, 2016

I can write until my fingers cramp and truly not capture the realities of the dysfunction of the Board of Education for the Poway Unified School District. I don't want give the picture or belief the entire board is the cause of this dysfunction. The easiest way for people to make this judgement is to attend or watch video of the School Board in action. The PUSD videos all board meeting and places them on their web site for the community to view. (Click HERE for link)

I have viewed the video from the April 5, 2016, board meeting several times. I took the time to break out segments of the meeting to highlight some of the dysfunction, unprofessional and at times hostile words among boards members. Like public comments, it appears civility and professional decorum is no longer the norm, but more of the anomaly. 

At the board meeting on the 5th, the actions of board members that caught my attention started around the 2:09 mark in the video. Starting with "First Read" item F212 Revisions to Board Policy 4.123 Sexual Harassment. The discussion regarding the changes being proposed had me scratching my head. Did I understand clearly Ms. Beatty's concerns? She didn't want mandatory reporting of Sexual Harassment if the law did not mandate it? That this would in some way create a liability to the district when reported? I'm confused. I watched this item a couple of times trying to understand her concerns and was left with not understanding what really she was trying to get at.

Then came the fun part of the meeting "New Items" on the board agenda. H702 and H703. These start at the 2:17:42 mark on the video. The first item H702 was brought forward by Ms. Beatty and Mr. Sellers. The item was brought forward to discuss the use of legal firms. No explanation is necessary. Watch the exchanges and words spoken. I will point out that in my life time of living in the City of San Diego and reading the San Diego Union Tribune, I take exception to anyone who uses an article in this daily periodical, as fact or reason for any action.





Then comes item H703, starting at the 2:24:10 mark of the video. This item was again brought forward as a new item by Ms. Beatty and Mr. Sellers. The item was a new job description and position "Deputy Superintendent of Administrative Services". Ms. Beatty starts her presentation at 2:25:10 of the video. I condensed several snips of the dialogue that took place for this item. First is Ms. Beatty.


  After some discussion Mr. Patapow.


Mr. Sellers



Mr. Zane




More Sellers with O'Connor-Ratcliff



Ms. Beatty and Mr. Patapow



Mr. Pujar (Student Representative)



Mr. Sellers



There is more discussion and we come back to Sellers.



Nearing the end with Mr. Pujar, Sellers and Mr. Zane.


I know, you thought it was ending. 



The last words, kinda, sorta......



There was more to this discussion and I would strongly urge you to view the almost 50 minutes of back and forth among board members.

The discussion ended and the meeting came to a close. The real fire works took place after the cameras were turned off. Mr. Sellers verbally attacked a member of the staff. His words and actions a reflection of his inability to act in a professional manner. The lack of civility, total arrogance and condescending manner with which he comports himself is completely and totally unacceptable. His is a symptom of a degradation of character that permeates the board room. 

Ms. O'Connor-Ratcliff, Mr. Zane and Mr. Patapow each attempts to act with civility and respect in the face of those who chose to attack with each exchange. Staff has grown weary of the badgering and constant condescending attacks of their abilities and character. It has to change. We have to change it.

Friday, April 8, 2016

Must See Public Comments from the PUSD Board Meeting April 5, 2016

It has been a while since I last posted. Sometimes work gets in the way of other activities and interests. I have also been working with others in an attempt to have a positive impact on the lives of students and education. But, I find it necessary to again devote the time to contribute to this BLOG and highlight some behavior that is not positive nor contributing in a positive manner to the education experience of children in the Poway Unified School District.

On Tuesday, April 5, 2016, the monthly meeting of the Board of Education was held. The meeting was a perfect display of what is wrong with the Board of Education and some members of the public. Three members of the public, who spoke during Item C of the agenda, showed again their true character. First on display was Keith Wilson. Wilson was called (1:12:58 on the video) and as he does, focused his diatribe of hate and filth toward the superintendent.

(Video clip of his comments)


This individual lacks good moral character. The hatred and repulsive comments spewing from Wilson's mouth highlight the assemblage of poor moral character he exhibits on a regular basis in both word and action.  

Wilson was followed by his son-in-law, Christopher Garnier. Garnier was called to the microphone at 1:16:14 on the video. Watch as Garnier sits and stares at the members of the board. Then listen carefully to his words. 

(Video clip of his comments)



Christopher Garnier, like his father-in-law, lacks good moral character. Garnier will use words to shock and scare others, as he does in his diatribe, far removed from anything to do with moving the educational experience of children in a positive direction. When challenged for his use of offensive words, he will site his right to free speech. The repulsive comments and hatred he exhibits are clear examples of the content of his character, having nothing to do with the color of his skin.

Christopher Garnier was followed by his wife, Kim Garnier, daughter of Keith Wilson. Kim Garnier was called to the microphone at 1:20:43 on the video. 

(Video clip of her comments)



Kim Garnier makes some very bold statements and allegations. What I find interesting is her lack of supporting documents. Let's say what Kim Garnier said in the above clip is accurate. Let's say the quote attributed to a captain with the San Diego Police Department was provided accurately. Don't you believe Kim Garnier would have had copies of these e-mails to shove in the faces of the board members? She was reading from notes on a piece of paper. She was not reading from documents retrieved from a PRA. Bottom line, Kim Garnier is not relevant nor believable. Like her father and like her husband, a lack of character shows through her every word and action. Victims who yell the loudest, the most often and when questioned are seldom victims of another, but victims of their own making.

I saw in the Pomerado News that Wilson and his group had "called off" the re-call effort to re-call Mr. Patapow. In the article, Wilson boasts his group secured 8,000 signatures. Excuse me for what I am about to write; BULLSHIT!!!!!!! Wilson et al may have obtained 800 signatures, at most. His assertion they obtained 8,000 signatures if patently false and not reflective of reality. To add to their deception, Wilson and his "coalition" formed to seek candidates for this years school board election, announced in the same press release, used content from the web site Coalition for Effective School Board Leadership . 

Lastly, to highlight the lack of moral character of Keith Wilson; I received an e-mail Keith Wilson sent to a staff member of PUSD on Wednesday, April 6, 2016, at 11:10 AM.

The words and actions of Keith Wilson, Christopher and Kim Garnier, highlight again a family that lacks of moral character on a grand scale. The sad reality is the affect this is having on the three young children in this home. Hate cannot be turned off at the door as one enters his/her home. Playing the victim is quickly learned through the eyes and ears of a young and impressionable child. The repeated sexual references, in every diatribe delivered by Keith Wilson, no doubt played over and rehearsed for all to hear, fall onto the ears of the young and not so innocent ears of the impressionable child. It is truly sad to witness such hatred. 

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Collusion Beatty & Sellers Style

The acts of two individuals, acting in secret cooperation, can have a profound affect on the actions of others. The plotting and collaboration of two scheming individuals who develop a secret understanding is collusion. Like the actions of the B-S Duo, Beatty and Sellers. Follow along if you will.....

If you missed the PUSD Board of Education meeting February 9, 2016, you missed a raw performance by the B-S Duo. It all started at 1:56:30 into the meeting with Item D-601, Ratification of the Associate Superintendent Contracts. Since late last year, the B-S Duo have stalled approval of the Associate Superintendent's contracts. They purposefully (they will deny this) avoided attending a meeting called to finalize these contracts in January. Then last night, they worked together to stall approval again.

If you missed the meeting, you missed the first "Road Block" thrown up by the B-S Duo. I commented at the end of my last post, to watch for the B-S Duo to start throwing road blocks up in an attempt to stall or impede actions Ms. O'Connor-Ratcliff or others bring before the board. I had no idea it would happen so quickly.

You really have to view the video to understand the actions of Beatty and Sellers. I could give a blow by blow and articulate what is going on, but you really need to experience it to appreciate it. Start viewing the video at 1:56:30. The agenda item is called by President O'Connor-Ratcliff. At 1:57:03, Sellers grabs his microphone and said, "I would like to move we send these contracts back to counsel for further revision." You REALLY need to watch the video to see what happens next. Sellers completes his motion and looks to Beatty, then leans in as if to say "wake up, your turn". You can see by her reaction, she didn't think Sellers would be finished so quickly. Beatty clearly flinches, grabs her microphone and quickly seconds the motion.

Before I get into what transpired next and Sellers' "explanation", I want to comment on the appropriateness and timing of Beatty and Seller' words and actions. The Associate Superintendent's Contracts have been a subject of conversation for many months. Sellers has openly refused to discuss or participate in these discussions because of his disdain for Dr. Collins. Sellers has been an impediment to resolution of these contracts. The "concerns" voiced by Sellers during his "explanation" were nothing more than a smoke screen to further impede the ratification of these contracts. ALL of the issues raised should have been brought forward and discussed PRIOR to the ratification meeting. The board members (Sellers and Beatty) had the documents in hand with sufficient time to voice concerns, allow for necessary changes to be made and allow for the vote to be taken to ratify these contracts. Beatty and Sellers chose a different path, one that in my opinion was plotted by two scheming individuals, in secret, with the goal of stalling ratification and trying to upstage Ms. O'Connor-Ratcliff and make the others on the Board look bad.

The end game, for which they actually lost, was to have the board ratify the contracts, after Beatty and Sellers gave the appearance the contracts were flawed and in some way illegal. The contacts were not ratified. They will be reviewed again and discussed and again presented for ratification.

Some will say the B-S Duo are watching out for voters/taxpayers with their close scrutiny of these contracts. Reality is, their actions are nothing short of reckless and disruptive. The resulting actions have taken their toll on administrators and others. Associate Superintendent Tracy Hogarth announced her retirement and it has also been said Associate Superintendent of Business Support Services, Malliga Tholandi announced her retirement the day after the board meeting.Both will be leaving on June 30, 2016. Also leaving is Wendy Anderson, the Executive Assistant to the Board, who has accepted a position in San Diego Unified as the Superintendents secretary, leaving March 1, 2016.

That is not the end of what is to come, as a result of the actions of these two. There are a number of Director's who are retirement eligible and contemplating their futures. There are also six (6), count them, SIX open superintendents positions open in San Diego County and the likely retirement of Dr. Collins in the near future. All of this together, does not bode well for Poway Unified.

The continued actions of the B-S Duo show a total and utter lack of respect for the employees of the district. Their actions speak volumes, to every level of employee, when the Board cannot ratify the contract of the three Associate Superintendents. People concerned with these actions need to get involved. Express your concern by contacting Beatty and Sellers and letting them know your concerns. Hold them accountable. Tell them you are watching and aware. Tell them their actions are not acceptable. The B-S Duo both believe they have a mandate to do whatever they chose to do.



It is time they hear from the silent, concerned and involved parent, voter, taxpayer. Call, text, e-mail and write them with your concerns. Below is their contact information.


Kimberley Beatty



Charles Sellers